Hamilton Montana Wall of Corruption Exposed by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox and Michael Spreadbury - Hamilton Montana News.
Thursday, June 16, 2011
OMG who googled this "ARE restraining orders OF PUBLIC RECORD in hamilton montana"
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Hamilton Montana Police, Perry Backus Ravalli Republic, and My Day in Hamilton Montana Seeking Justice.
After This Clip, we Were met outside by 6 Hamilton Montana Police Officers. Only one was concerned with why I came there, with real justice and real facts. The Other 5 simply cornered, questioned and harassed Michael Spreadbury Whom I had just met in person the Night Before.
See the Point of 6 cops showing up and within minutes was to Discredit Michael Spreadbury to protect the Wall of Corruption in Hamilton Montana and the point was NOT to help Montana Victims seeking Justice with Hamilton Montana Police, Hamilton Montana Judges, and Hamilton Montana Courts.
My Death Threat, My Wanting a Protective Order had Nothing to Do with Michael Spreadbury. I went to Hamilton Montana because the Man I feared lived there ... I went to film the Denny Rehberg Listening Session, I went to Interview for the Documentary Beneath the Beauty - Yet
those 6 Hamilton Montana Police Officers made My Story out to be all about this man I had just met, all because he was telling their dirty little secrets on the Internet.
I Called Perry Backus of the Ravalli Republic Newspaper, a couple hours after I left the Court House and told him not to print anything before he got my side of the story. Once Perry Backus of the Ravalli Republic Newspaper got my side, nothing was printed as the Point of Perry Backus of the Ravalli Republic Newspaper was to get something incriminating on Michael Spreadbury and was not to actually write the real news that would affect Hamilton Montana Citizens. Though you all had a right to know..
Much More on my Day In Hamilton Montana Coming Soon.. and 3 Weeks after this Day, I HAD to go back to Hamilton Montanan as Justice of the Peace, Robin Clute GAVE an Illegal - Not Based in Fact or Law - Protective Order to The Man I feared, against ME..
the Montana News Media
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger....
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Ravalli County District Judge James Haynes - Jeffrey Fowler was Sentenced for Felony Theft - Hope for Hamilton.
In Towns all across the United States.. Good Judges are Trying to Make Good Decisions, and in those towns.. there is a Wall of Corruption that Makes Sure they don't...
the Wall of Corruption will bring them Economic Terrorism, will harass their family, Set them up and well.. the Wall of Corruption has so many connections that a Good Judge in this situation does not dare go against them.
This is the same for "Good Cops" - My wish is that through our Exposing the Bad Cops, the Criminal County Attorneys, the Attorneys and Judges who Violate your Constitutional rights.. my wish is that the Good Ones - the Judges, Attorneys, Cops and Prosecutors that Do Obey the Law and Do NOT Violate your Constitutional Rights will have Room to Do their Job the Right, Honorable way, Law Abiding Way.
Ravalli County District Judge James Haynes is to be Commended for Acting within the laws of the State of Montana. I Say that Indeed Ravalli County District Judge James Haynes deserves to be Called Honorable Judge James Haynes.
The former sheriff's sergeant will also spend 15 days in jail.
Ravalli County District Judge James Haynes told Fowler he had broken the trust handed to him by the public and was nothing more than an embezzler.
Fowler told the judge that he didn't actually steal anything.
Near the end of the three-hour sentencing hearing, Fowler insisted he'd simply taken possession of the stolen ammunition and sold it to different businesses and individuals over a nine-month period of time.
Fowler told the judge that he had an accomplice who actually stole the ammo.
But a state investigator testified he was convinced that wasn't true.
Montana Department of Criminal Investigation agent Shane Shaw said he spent hundreds of hours interviewing more than 50 people while putting together the case against Fowler.
Shaw said he was convinced that Fowler had acted alone in stealing and reselling thousands of rounds of ammunition from the county between October 2008 and June 2009.
"I don't believe anyone else was involved," Shaw said.
The investigator tracked ammunition taken from several different locations, including a vault in the courthouse, and sold it to businesses and individuals through lot numbers.
Fowler sold some of the ammunition while dressed in his uniform and driving his patrol car, Shaw said.
Fowler's attorney, Milt Datsopoulos, said his client was addicted to pain medication as a result of several surgeries over the course of a number of years.
Fowler's wife, Brenda, said she had seen her husband change significantly over the past two years because of his addiction.
"He started taking pills more often, and more often became more often," she said. "It was a tough road for him to get off the pain medication, but he did it on his own."
In the meantime, she said her family's life was turned upside down.
"All four of us have paid a price," she said. "We've lost our home. We've lost our family. ... Life has not been easy going through this."
Ravalli County Sheriff Chris Hoffman said the sheriff's department has paid its own price.
"We live and die by people's confidence," Hoffman testified. "When that is compromised, then we have lost one of the biggest tools that we have to be effective in the community."
Lawyers are already challenging earlier court cases that involved Fowler.
The case against convicted arsonist Donnie Mack Sellers was appealed to the Montana Supreme Court. At issue is Fowler's involvement in the initial arrest of Sellers and the possibility his testimony was tainted.
"When we sit in this box and address a jury ... they need to know that what comes out of our mouth is the truth," Hoffman said. "They need to know that they can trust us."
After the hearing, Hoffman said he was "very satisfied" with the investigation completed by the state in the case.
"As to why Mr. Fowler would want to try and implicate others in this office, I don't have that answer," he said. "He had a number of opportunities to come forward with information and he never did."
Reporter Perry Backus can be reached at 363-3300 or at pbackus@ravallirepublic.com. "
More Flat Out Lies, in my Opinion from the Mouth of Hamilton Montana - Ravalli County Sheriff Chris Hoffman.
Saturday, December 18, 2010
Hamilton Montana Judge Haynes is Ravalli County's only hope..
As you know Hamilton Montana Judge Haynes denied me a protective order in August of 2009. Hamilton Montana Judge Haynes did this based in Montana Law and Had the balls to sign a paper that stated the reasons why with the Montana Codes that applied and sign that paper. I have no issue with Hamilton Montana Judge Haynes. Basing decisions in Law is what we are Fighting for ... Recent News on Hamilton Montana Judge Haynes.
"Judge Haynes rules against Ravalli County in subdivision lawsuit
Ravalli County was "arbitrary and capricious" when it turned down a variance for two subdivisions east of Florence in 2008, a judge ruled Wednesday.
The Ravalli County Commission will get another chance to review the variance request as part of Ravalli County District Judge James Haynes' decision.
In his 43-page ruling, Haynes said the commission's decision to turn down a variance request for the Morado Mountain Estate and Sandhill Ridge subdivisions was flawed on a number of levels.
The two subdivisions proposed to create 93 single-family lots when their original applications were submitted in 2006.
The developers requested a variance in 2008 from the county's subdivision regulations governing road standards for 3.3 miles of Eight Mile Creek Road that accessed their properties.
That roadway has a 50-foot easement. New county subdivision regulations required a 60-foot easement.
The developers weren't able to obtain easements to make the road wider. Instead, they offered to pay $600,000 for paving materials to repair the roadway, which county road department officials said was in disrepair.
The county would have paid $300,000 to provide the labor to improve the road.
The county planning and road departments recommended approval of the variance. By a narrow margin, the planning board voted to recommend denial.
On May 6, 2008, the commission voted 2-2 on the variance request. Commissioner Alan Thompson was unexpectedly absent from the meeting due to a medical emergency.
The matter was then postponed until Thompson could weigh in and break the tie vote.
When the commission met again on May 27, commissioners Kathleen Driscoll and Carlotta Grandstaff changed their votes and the variance was denied 3-2.
The developers filed suit in August 2008.
Their complaint focused on the commission's decision to allow the entire board to re-vote on May 27 and the process the commission used to apply the county's variance criteria.
In his ruling, Haynes agreed the county had come up short in both areas.
In its decision to allow the entire board to re-vote, the county argued additional information was added between the first and second meetings, which should have opened the door for consideration by the entire board.
The developers said they only agreed to the first meeting's postponement to allow Thompson a chance to cast his vote.
Thompson voted in favor of the variance.
Haynes said if the commission decided the additional information was anything more than clarification, it was required to evaluate whether the public should have the opportunity to comment.
"The record shows the BCC (commission) never evaluated, categorized or otherwise issued the requisite determination about the fulfillment of the public's right to comment," Haynes wrote.
Both parties made a mutual mistake over the intent and scope of postponing the meeting and the commission considered additional information without following its own rules, Haynes said.
Haynes said the commission was arbitrary and capricious in its decision to proceed with a re-vote.
Likewise, Haynes said the commission failed to appropriately consider the county's variance criteria.
For instance, Haynes said the commission "never squarely addressed" whether imposing strict compliance with a requirement to purchase 3.3 miles of additional easement without the power of eminent domain constituted an undue hardship on the developers.
Haynes said his decision focused on the commission's process, not the substance of its decisions.
Since both sides came up short in a number of aspects in the case, Haynes said it would be premature for him to order a reversal of the county's decision before the commission had a chance to revisit the issue.
"Both parties contributed to the May 6 postponement, neither party clearly grasped the type of variance under scrutiny, and neither party understood whether the five criteria were properly applied," the judge wrote.
Haynes ordered the case remanded back to the commission for new hearings on the developers' original subdivision and associated variance applications.
The judge dismissed Ravalli County's motion for summary judgment. He allowed the county 20 days to file any briefs on why it disagrees with his decision.
Ravalli County Commission Chair Greg Chilcott said Thursday the commission would not be able to reconsider the matter before the New Year. Chilcott said he hadn't yet read Haynes' decision.
Grandstaff and the developer's attorney, William Van Canagan, did not return a phone call. "
Reach reporter Perry Backus at 363-3300 or pbackus@ravallirepublic.com.
Monday, September 7, 2009
In My Opinion Judge Robin Clute has Violated my Human Rights, Discriminated Against me and Put my Life in Danger.
He is Dangerous, he has written foul threats online about me, he has threatened to permanently put me down, he has a Concealed Carry Permit. Sean Boushie Collects Guns, Makes Guns, Brags of How Much ammunition he carries.
Judge Haynes said if he was not my boyfriend, not a family member he could not give me a protective order. I was denied Protection in Ravalli County and now I have to go back there as if I am the aggressor. What is Wrong with this Picture? Do I have no Rights what so ever? Why?
Their is an Item on the Protective Order Issued by Robin Clute that claims there is an email from a S.M. - and that I put this guy up to that email. This email was sent, and Sean Boushie did file in the Lincoln County Courts over that. I certainly did not put the guy up to it. The thing is the Email was not sent to Sean Boushie, the email was sent to No One.
My death Threat came from the Email Address CrystalCoxIsABitch@Yahoo.com - this S. M. Guy sent an email to that account, telling that person whoever it was, the mystery person, the guy who threatening to Permanently Put me Down and bragged about his hatred and how much ammo he carries... telling this person what he thought of them. The next thing you know Sean Boushie surfaces and calls the local cops in Eureka Montana to file a Report against this guy.
Obviously the immediate question that arises is how did Sean Boushie get that email. How did he Check that particular email account, assume the message was for him and then file a report and why in the world would Law Enforcement let him file a report claiming he was threatened if he did not own that email account that sent me a Death Threat. And now my Protective Order violating my Human Rights, given by Judge Robin Clute, this order claims that there is evidence to this email that was given with the judgement, the request to be protected from me due to a claim of a fear of safety. Did Robin Clute get this email, is it in her file, this directly ties Sean Boushie to my Death Threat and now she has issued a Protective Order for Him, against me.
I don't know if Ravalli County Judges Hate Woman in general or if it is just me. I don't know if Judge Haynes was within bounds on local law, or denied me for political reasons NOT connected to me. I don't know if Robin Clute was in bounds within the law with giving her order of protection. I do know that She has stripped me of all rights, as I have to stay away from a Man I have not seen in 14 years, don't know what he looks like these days, don't know what he drives, and he has given Robin Clute Photos of me, he certainly knows what I look like and can legally walk right up to me. With This I feel violated in ways I cannot begin to describe and a Woman Judge, Shocking .. really shocking... No Justice ..
Yahoo can and will soon verify what IP address checked this email, it was certainly nothing to do with me. The Courts will eventually have to turn over Sean Boushie's report to someone and this will all come out into the Court System.
Until Then Judge Clute has left me helpless and I want you folks of Hamilton of Montana to know this, there is reports the day I was in Hamilton to get Protection, there is video and signed documents of me being Denied, and Now this.. the Honorable Judge Clute has given Sean Boushie Protection from Me, I have NEVER ever threatened to do anything to him, never been to his home, never been up to his car, never spoke to him. He harasses me, sends me cease and desist letter for talking about his letter to the editor on my blog, emails me hate, endangers me, THREATENS me and then tells a Hamilton Judge he fears me and he is Given an Order of Protection.
After a Month of Trying to Get Protection to protect me FROM Sean Boushie, after talking to Hamilton Police, Missoula Police, University of Montana Police and Being Denied a Right to Protection by Judge Haynes in Hamilton, in writing, and being denied a protective order in Eureka due to lack of evidence at that time.. now all he has to do is make stuff up about me, say he is scared of me and Judge Clute gives him and Order of Protection.
Now Monday Morning he will be back on my Blogs, stalking me and my only proof is to post those stats to show that he sit on my site all day every work day and is paid by the University of Montana to do it. I started posted stats 6 weeks or so into his stalking to prove he was. He searches things on my site like "sandptcpl" just to Threaten me, for this is the author of a Hate Blog about me.. at this link..
http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:Tcuv7M3w0GYJ:watchlincolncountywatch.blogspot.com/2009_07_01_archive.html+%22sandptcpl%22&cd=8&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
No One else would search that, and he does it to stalk and threaten me, Judge Clute must not know any of this stuff. the Question is what does she Think She knows about all this that she feels I am a danger to the man that wants to permenantly put me down???
He also searches his name all day, he is letting me know that I can't stop him and the University of Montana is paying him to do this. Now he claims I am threatening his job, WHAT? I told the U of M what he was doing, I proved a month of factual stats with their IP address and they have done nothing. I have proof of all I am saying and yet a Blind I is turned at me in a most shocking, outrageous display of discrimination.
I showed the Ravalli County Courts my Proof, what was happening to me, it was recorded in Video, I brought Stats, Proof of a Hate blog with the same wording as my death threat, proof of real defamation, proof a Realty site he wrote on in someone else's name and because he was NOT family they denied me a Protective Order.
Last Said this Same Court System, this Same County had me served.. Hate Crime, Human Rights Crime, and so much more... You have no Rights in Ravalli County Montana. NONE.
r