Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Ravalli County Attorney Fulbright

Bitterroot Star
Ravalli County Attorney Fulbright & Ravalli County Sheriff Hoffman wave at each other.


Here is an article that Bill Fulbright wont want you to see. Mr. Fulbright and Angela Wetzsteon, his deputy were walking back from lunch on a June 2011 day. Some chalk was on the sidewalk. It said

Play the "Find my Threat" Game; 

Google "Find my Threat"

www.FindmyThreat.com

Writing on a sidewalk was a crime said Bill Fulbright, Ravalli County Attorney in Montana. I think he has about 6 kids, so I bet one of them wrote on the sidewalk at some time in their childhood. Bill Fulbright treats people differently, because he has so much power (from the people). I wonder who politically got rid of George Corn (www.GeorgeCorn.com) and allowed Bill Fulbright to win the County Prosecutor position?

I wonder...... [the Bitterroot Rising Archives are on the right]

Bill Fulbright did not show up August 8, 2007 to supervise Angela Wetzsteon as she was a law student and could not practice law. Angela Wetzsteon did anyway.

Bill Fulbright allowed constitutional rights to be bent, and did not do anything. Here is how Bill Fulbright handled BEING A WITNESS TO A "CRIME";   He prosecuted it.
[Legal note: a county prosecutor who witnesses a crime cannot prosecute that crime].

There are no standards in Ravalli County, there are no rights in Ravalli Co. Funny, that is the opening paragraph to the president asking for civil rights.......from the first African American president.
read more:
http://www.montanapoliticalnews.com/2011/06/open-letter-to-president-obama-pleading.html

BOTTOM LINE: Bill Fulbright has no soul.  He cannot uphold rights, he cannot make a decision to do the right thing.  Imagine if he thought about what he did.  Has he seen George Corn lately?

Brief then a PRESS RELEASE from 2007 about Bill Fulbright below.


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Cause No. 10-36086

District of Montana Cause No. 9:10-cv-00049-DWM


Michael E. Spreadbury

Hamilton, MT 59840



Self-represented Plaintiff and Appellant


MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY, )

Plaintiff and Appellant )     WRIT OF PROHIBITION

v.                                  )        IN RE:

CHRIS HOFFMAN et. al. )                                        MICHAELE.  SPREADBURY                                                                 

Defendants and Appellees )

______________________________ )

Comes now, Spreadbury pleads Writ of Prohibition before Honorable Court. Plaintiff Spreadbury put in position by Defendants where great injustice and irreparable harm will result if writ is denied. Appeal cannot cure action in lower court, acting without jurisdiction. Request is made in good faith by Spreadbury.


Relief Sought

Spreadbury seeks 9thCircuit Court to enjoin Defendant Ravalli County from prosecuting TK-2011-1426 in lower court without jurisdiction as described herein.

Issues Presented

Spreadbury presents issue of lower court prosecuting without probable cause, jurisdiction; irreparable damage to Spreadbury if convicted. Spreadbury wrote on public sidewalk with Chalk, charged with crimes (Appendix A). Prior deferred Sentence for asking librarian for help in public without threat (Appendix B, D) yielded 1yr. probation for Felony Intimidation MCA§ 45-5-203; Defendants deprive Spreadbury freedom of speech in continuous harm. Great Injustice, irreparable harm, without appeal remedy, lower court without jurisdiction; parameters met for Writ of Prohibition in TK-2011-1426 Ravalli Co. Montana:

Lifetime felony conviction, possible 10 year prison sentence for:

1. Asking a librarian for help in public without threat (Appendix B)

Cause No. DC-09-154 21st Montana 21st Judicial District [State Court].

2. Writing with Chalk on sidewalk as crime TK-2011-1426 (Face of Citation Appendix A)

Reason Writ should be Issued:

Spreadbury is within case and controversy with Ravalli County Montana for deprivation of rights Article III US Constitution. In aforementioned, Spreadbury pled for injunctive relief to District court (Appendix C). Bias toward Spreadbury: Defendant law student, clinic attendee at US District Court for Montana, Missoula Division, paid influence by Montana Law School for US District Judge Malloy, US Magistrate Lynch, clinic director required recusal 28 USC § 455 et. seq. Defendants deprive established rights of Spreadbury with 4 unlawful criminal charges since 2007 protected in Amendments to US Constitution. Spreadbury has been subjected to 3 unlawful arrests, §1983 case pending in this circuit. Career, livelihood interference by Defendants pled in aforementioned Gabbert v. Conn 131 F. 3d 793 (1997). Lower Court without jurisdiction, irreparable harm, prosecutor bias, no reparable relief through appeal available to Spreadbury, Writ of Prohibition ripe before this court.

Facts of Current Case Before Court

Case and Controversy of Spreadbury v. Hoffman et. al. is before this court as Cause No. 10-36086 for 42 USC §1983, civil rights inter alia. Within the 2ndAmended complaint, Spreadbury prays for the following injunctive relief:

1. Count 8—Ravalli County Attorney Office (RCAO)

Prosecutor Fulbright now elected County Attorney, admits to Defense Counsel: “If it were any other person but Spreadbury, charges would be dismissed. (in Appendix B Opening Brief of Plaintiff)”.

Fulbright did not adhere to discovery rules, speedy trial provisions at common law, has personal interest in Spreadbury’s unlawful conviction.

Angela Wetzsteon prosecuted Spreadbury as unsupervised law student, now employed as Ravalli County prosecutor, personal interest in conviction.

Spreadbury pleads in ¶109 2nd Amended complaint: “RCAO has initiated action without probable cause against Spreadbury, more than reasonable belief it will continue….unless preliminary injunctive relief enjoined.”

Fulbright, Wetzsteon have personal interest in obtaining conviction, bias.

2. Count 9--Ravalli County Justice Court

Justice of the Peace in Ravalli County allowed unsupervised law student to prosecute law, denied motion to uphold Spreadbury’s 6th Amendment protected in US Constitution (in Appendix B Opening Brief of Plaintiff). Spreadbury believed judiciary of Ravalli County would act with malice, did act with malice towards Spreadbury July 22, 2011 in arraignment for charges without probable cause, equal protection to protected interest in Amendment 5,14 US Constitution; lower court without jurisdiction.

Spreadbury pleads in ¶120 2nd Amended Complaint of aforementioned conspiracy of Hamilton (MT) Police Department, Ravalli County Attorney Office (RCAO), Ravalli County Sheriff Office (RCSO), Ravalli County Judiciary will put Spreadbury in jeopardy of future constitutional deprivations. This Writ of Prohibition manifests this belief as reality.

Facts of Current Controversy

Spreadbury exercised right to free speech, protected 1st Amendment US Constitution to write with chalk on public sidewalk June 29, 2011. No less than 15 peace officers from Hamilton City Police Department, Ravalli County Sheriff encircled, and detained Spreadbury. Spreadbury cooperated with officers, and remained calm. In challenge to unlawful detention, Spreadbury respectfully informed officers if no charge filed, practice deprived 4th Amendment right to be free from seizures by government. Ravalli County Deputy caught up with Spreadbury and asked if he had written “all of the chalking”. Spreadbury answered in affirmative and Deputy ordered Spreadbury to stop. Charge of Disorderly Conduct, Montana Code Ann. MCA§ 45-8-101 and Criminal Mischief Montana Code Ann. MCA§ 45-6-101, both misdemeanors charged. On face of Citation is written “writing on sidewalk with chalk” (Appendix A).

Chalk not permanent damage, no disorderly conduct effected by Spreadbury, witnessed by County Attorney Fulbright, Deputy Wetzsteon, State Public Defenders June 29, 2011.

Third annual “Daly Days” Chalk Festival held by Ravalli County Montana day after Spreadbury arraignment before Judge Burnsides, substitute Ravalli County Justice Court JP from Darby, Montana City Court.

Spreadbury plead not guilty in arraignment July 22, 2011to both charges without assistance of counsel, prosecution not present at arraignment. Judge Burnsides made aware of Spreadbury disability status, documented by Social Security Administration. Judge executed necessary paperwork, court restrictions, adjourns hearing. Outside official hearing, Spreadbury informs Deputy, few feet away of Chalk Festival in appropriate voice. Judge Burnsides receives ex parte communication from Deputy about communication with Spreadbury not related to case. Judge Burnsides recalls Spreadbury, finds Spreadbury guilty of contempt, without representation, although Justice Court contempt precluded as hearing adjourned, Montana Code Ann. MCA§ 3-10-401. Judge Burnsides ordered the unlawful arrest of Spreadbury, a disabled person per Americans with Disability Act (ADA) without representation, due process, probable cause (jurisdiction) protected in Amendment 14 US Constitution.

At Ravalli County Detention Center, Sheriff Hoffman, main defendant in aforementioned created instruction list, specific treatment of Spreadbury: no clothes, no toilet, no privileges, isolated confinement, withhold prescribed medications, mental health evaluation recommended general population; Hoffman over-rode with “policy or custom” depriving Spreadbury right not to be treated with cruel, unusual punishment Monell v. NYC Dept. of Social Services 436 US 658 (1978), Amendment 8, US Constitution. Ravalli County Deputy in confinement taunted/withheld Spreadbury prescribed medications by more than 24 hours; detention staff attempted to under-medicate Spreadbury with prescribed medication in Ravalli County custody.

Brief in Support

Spreadbury properly pleads for equitable, injunctive relief from Honorable Court in form of Writ of Prohibition in aforementioned as court below lacks jurisdiction, great injustice, irreparable harm will result if writ is not issued US v. Brooklier 685 F. 2d 1162 (9thCir., 1982).

Traditional use of writ in aid of appellate jurisdiction both at common law and in the federal courts has been to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction.

Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn. 219 US at 26 (1943) citing Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States ex. rel. Cambell 289 US 385 (1933).

Spreadbury pleads to Honorable Court: Ravalli County, prosecutors in aforementioned established prior bias, willingness to deprive established right, prayer for equitable, injunctive relief ripe before this court, well established precedent met to implement Writ of Prohibition. Spreadbury aware issue of writ is matter of discretion with this court Pacific Car & Foundry Co. v. Pence 403 F. 2d 953 (9thCir., 1968). Denial of writ leaves Spreadbury no appellate remedy for lack of jurisdiction, bias at Ravalli County Justice Court from no probable cause for Disorderly Conduct, Criminal mischief June 29, 2011by prosecutor Fulbright with personal interest in obtaining conviction of Spreadbury Rest 2d Torts §666. Act of writing on sidewalk without communicating credible threat, obscene language protected Amendment 1, US Constitution.

Issue of writ prevents Judge Burnsides from all manner of errors, including departure from natural rules of natural justice, misconstruing substantive law Pulliam v. Allen 466 US at 533 (1984). Issue of jurisdiction for Ravalli County Court, “michiefs of misconstruction” against Spreadbury prevented by prohibition requested herein Pulliam at 534. Judge Burnsides former Ravalli County Deputy, prior contact with Spreadbury; prohibition for bias of prior knowledge, conflict of interest, current unlawful judicial conduct prevented by writ Ibid at 535. Honorable court has availability of collateral injunctive relief in exceptional cases as two Ravalli County Justices announce recusal, Judge Burnsides fails to lawfully adhere to proper Juris Prudence, contain bias to Spreadbury as question of lower court jurisdiction arise Ibid.

Relief is constitutionally required, necessary to avoid irreparable harm to Spreadbury Pulliam at 539. Spreadbury has filed in the aforementioned before this court for relief 42 USC §1983 inter alia. Section 1983 causes of action excellent exception to the anti-injunction statute allowing Federal Courts to intervene for Federal rights pled by Spreadbury Pulliam v. Allen 466 US at 541 (1984). Spreadbury has pled for equitable, injunctive relief against Defendant Ravalli County actors; injunctive relief to protect parties before this court for unconstitutional action under color of law from all branches of government: Executive, Legislative, Judicial Mitchum v. Foster 407 US at 242 (1972).

A writ is not directed against a Judicial officer, but the nature of the thing to be done Marbury v. Madison 5 US at 170 (1803). Where Judge Burnsides directed by law to do a certain act affecting the rights of Spreadbury issue of Writ of Prohibition is proper Ibid at 171. When jurisdiction of lower court doubtful, no other legal remedy, Spreadbury subject to unlawful prosecution, lower court lacking jurisdiction from no probable cause, writ is proper Smith v. Whitney 116 US at 173 (1886). Honorable court has jurisdiction to issue Writ of Prohibition 28 USC § 1291 Ibid at 175. The Court may restrain the exercise of judicial function on court about to exceed its jurisdiction Smith v. Whitney 116 US at 176 (1886).

Writ defined, Montana Code Ann. MCA§ 27-27-101 International Brotherhood of Elec. Workers AFL-CIO Local 1638 v. Montana Power Co. 280 Mont. 55 (1996):

A Writ arrests the proceedings of any tribunal…exercising judicial functions when such proceedings are without or in excess of the jurisdiction of such tribunal.

Spreadbury is appropriately attaching writ to Ravalli County, not private party, court marshal in the aforementioned.

Before a Writ of Prohibition may be granted Spreadbury must demonstrate that the acts of public officials are clearly unlawful under MCA§ 27-27-101 Kimble Properties v. Dept. of State Lands 231 Mont. 54 (1988). Court below, Ravalli County Justice Court without jurisdiction of criminal charge TK-2011-1426 against Spreadbury without probable cause, unlawful at common law Id.

As Defendant Ravalli County effects malicious prosecution on Spreadbury with intent to deprive Spreadbury equal protection of the laws or is otherwise intended to subject Bretz, Cline, Spreadbury to denial of constitutional right “too striking to ignoreBretz v. Kelman 773 F. 2d at 1031 (9th Cir., 1985) citing Cline v. Brusett 661 F. 2d at 112 (9th Cir., 1981). A thirty year history of deprivation in the State of Montana, in color of law, civil conspiracy involving Montana State actors, including the Montana Attorney General, Montana Chief Justice, ranking Montana US Senator: provided Presidential appointment in 2008 to University of Montana Law School Dean Edwin Eck to allow Defendant law student Angela Wetzsteon’s violation of Montana Student Practice Rule in conspiracy to deprive Spreadbury equal protection of the laws, malicious prosecution at common law that interfered with Spreadbury’s profession at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) August 8, 2007 Gabbert v. Conn 131 F. 3d 793 (9thCir., 1997). Defendant Law Student Wetzsteon, unsupervised as Defendant Fulbright, Defendant Corn failed to appear at Spreadbury’s trial in absentia August 8, 2007 for TK-2006-3068 without probable cause, in violation of inalienable right Art. II s. 3 Montana Constitution: healthy environment, protect property, Amendment 6 US Constitutionfor speedy trial, right to confront witnesses. Defendant Wetzsteon presented tampered evidence from the Ravalli County Sheriff Department outside discovery provisions, prompting Defendant Fulbright to say to Spreadbury’s retained counsel “If it were anyone else but Spreadbury, the case would be dismissed (in Appendix B Opening Brief of Plaintiff).”

Accordingly, Writ of Prohibition should issue to end litigation and save needless expense where respondent court could not render valid judgment because of lack of jurisdiction State ex. rel. Redle v. District Court in and for Missoula Co. 102 Mont. 541 (1936). Writ of Prohibition is a clear and indisputable right to relief when a lack of all means to redress wrongs Ibid.

Defendant Bill Fulbright, Ravalli County Attorney utilized Rest 2d Torts §666 effect of advice of counsel on existence of probable cause to charge Spreadbury with criminal act without probable cause Ravalli CountyTK-2011-1426. Fulbright has personal interest in obtaining Spreadbury’s conviction, established bias in prosecuting Spreadbury.

Law enforcement at scene of Chalk on Sidewalk did not know how to charge Spreadbury, called Fulbright Rest 2d Torts §666 for advice of counsel. Charges without probable cause deprive Spreadbury equal protection, denial of constitutional right of due process, equal protection Amendment 14 US Constitution. Ravalli County Deputy wrote “writing on sidewalk with chalk” on Citation (Appendix A) for Disorderly Conduct, Criminal Mischief.

The Arizona Court of Appeals held that a citation was insufficient to support lower court finding of probable cause, establish Spreadbury committed offense of Disorderly Conduct, Criminal mischief [Ravalli CountyTK-2011-1426]; protected activity of writing with chalk on public sidewalk Amendment 1, US Constitution, Otel H. v. Barton 93 P. 3d 512 AZ App. (2003). Citation did not contain any factual allegations that crime was committed, no affidavit to prove facts, conclusion of law Spreadbury committed criminal act Ibid. Whatever procedure a state may adopt, it must provide fair and reliable determination of probable cause (herein and in Felony Intimidation DC-09-154 in the 21st Montana Judicial District) as a condition for any significant pre-trial restraint of liberty (Appendix A, B) US Amendment 4, Gerstein v. Pugh 420 US 103 (1975). Spreadbury subject to 3 weeks pre-trial detention Montana 21st District DC-09-154; 19 hour lockdowns pre-trial, inmate # 311635 Missoula County Detention Center November 9 2009 to December 3, 2009. Writ to Supreme Court State of Montana was denied in DC-09-154 (Appendix D), sentencing Judge Harkin “did not want case out of Montana” or transferred out of state at hearing October 15, 2010 due to it being “...a local issue.” State of Montana ranks 48th in continental US for Justice, [US Justice Dept. 2007]. Spreadbury had no choice to plead due to jury tainting by Defendant Newspaper in Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et. al. 9:11-cv-00064-DVM-JCL US District Court for the State of Montana Missoula Division.

Spreadbury pleads irreparable harm, large civil conspiracy in color of law, no jurisdiction of Ravalli County Justice Court in TK-2011-1426, no appellate remedy due to immediate risk of revocation of deferred sentence, conviction of felony, prison sentence for protected act of free speech requesting help from Librarian in public, chalk on public sidewalk (Appendix A, D) exercised by Spreadbury in Ravalli County Montana. Issue of Writ of Prohibition proper, meets standards since US Supreme Court precedent established in 1803.


Respectfully submitted to the court


Dated this ___ day of August, 2011.



________________________________

Michael E. Spreadbury, self-represented Plaintiff and Appellant.

 NOTE: Bill Fulbright Ravalli County Attorney 2010-2014; Angela Wetzsteon Deputy both witnesses to "crime" of sidewalk chalking.  Fulbright could not prosecute case as witnress to crime.  What rules, what ethics.  What supervision of Law Student Angela Wetzsteon August 8, 2007?

Note: Form 8, Certificate of Compliance on next page

Certificate of Service on page thereafter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:  This next post I wrote as I was deployed to FEMA in Texas.  While Bill Fulbright was getting his "Prosecutor of the Year" award, I obtained a recognition most employees of FEMA never get.  Bill Fulbright was nominated by his boss, George Corn.  Bill Fulbright the "county attorney" from Ravalli County Montana took the speedy trial rights, the very thing they swear to uphold. 

Enjoy this press release from 2007.






Prosecutor William "Bill" Fulbright

In 2007 a press release was issued about Bill Fulbright's "award" for Prosecutor of the Year. How much of an award is it when you nominate yourself within the Ravalli County Attorney Office in Montana?

Note: Prosecutors of the Year don't violate basic rights, or not appear to "supervise" students.
[ANGELA WETZSTEON unauthorized student, unsupervised because Bill Fulbright did not show up]
More on Angela Wetzsteon: On August 8, 2007 practiced law unsupervised, graduated from Montana law in 2008; gained admission to Montana Bar October 9, 2008.

read more: http://www.prosecutorcorruption.com/2011/11/angela-wetzsteon-file.html

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


We the People of Ravalli County
PO Box 416
Hamilton, MT 59840

For Immediate release: For more information:
October 9, 2007 Bitterroot Rising Archive

Ravalli County Attorneys help themselves to Prosecutor award.
Nominate themselves, despite constitutional violations.

Hamilton, Montana- Ravalli County Attorney George H. Corn, nominated William "Bill" Fulbright, a prosecutor from Hamilton as the Montana Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence (MCADSV) “Prosecutor of the Year”.

Bill Fulbright has been a prosecutor in Hamilton for the past 5 years, according to Joel Gallob, reporter for the Ravalli Republic.
Gallob does not site any other references besides prosecutors from the Ravalli County Attorney office in his story from October 8, 2007 published in the Republic.

Comment was not available from Kelsen Young, Executive Director of MCADSV from Helena, who gave the award Friday in Hamilton.

Bill Fulbright as Deputy Ravalli County Attorney violated the basic rights of a defendant in a case where prima facie evidence, that is, evidence to proceed with trial was lacking. In a statement made to defense council Sasha Brownlee[1] prior to trial, Fulbright exclaimed that “… if this had been anyone but (Spreadbury) the case would be dismissed.” This statement is evidence that Bill Fulbright does not respect the rule of law, and prosecutes with malice.

Further this statement violates the Montana Constitution Article II section 4 with respect to equal protection under the law. The same legal provision of equal protection is found in the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.

Bill Fulbright Deputy Ravalli County Attorney demonstrated further evidence of malicious prosecution when he asked a county judge, JP Jim Bailey to violate rules of the court as they pertain to evidence.
In a motion dated July 30, 2007 in State of Montana v. Mike Spreadbury case #TK 2006-3068. Bill Fulbright asked a judge to break the rules of the court for evidence when he failed to submit discovery, a responsibility of the prosecutor on any case.

When discovery is not submitted, that is immediate grounds for dismissal. When Ravalli County is involved however, anything apparently goes. [Angela Wetzsteon was allowed to practice law unsupervised]

Dean Eck of the University of Montana-Missoula School of Law states that when a lawyer initially makes false statements to judicial officers, then they are liable for ethical breech of the Montana Bar Association. Shawna Ryan, administrator for the Montana Bar in Helena, MT could not be reached for comment.
[Dean ECK was given a Presidential appointment to look the other way for Wetzsteon's conduct].

George H. Corn, the nominator for the award, asked the judge for the same evidence request (on the same day) when Bill Fullbright Deputy Ravalli County Attorney was denied on July 30.
George Corn ’s version of the motion was accepted, due to making false statement of “severe injury” to the witness when in fact no medical attention was necessary as the witness inflicted damage to themselves:



"Evidence" produced by law student Angela Wetzsteon

Notice: the RIGHT cheek is scratched by equal-distant lines--like fingernails.

Note: Michael Spreadbury was standing to this woman's LEFT.

Note: No glass embedded, no medical attention needed,
just corrupt Ravalli County Sheriff October 10, 2006

TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK HAS NEW MEANING NOW:
LOOK THE OTHER WAY FOR CORRUPTION IN MONTANA

As with his nomination for the prosecutor award, George H. Corn gets what he wants whenever he asks. Kathy Seeley, Assistant Attorney General for the State of Montana, and Josh Van De Wettering US Attorney in the Missoula office, in letters dated in April and September respectively state that George Corn has “wide latitude” in performing duties as County Attorney for Ravalli County, which seems to mean that he is above the Montana and US Constitutions. With the State of Montana and the US Justice Dept. protecting them, an award is small work for George H. Corn.

A defendant’s 6th Amendment right to speedy trial was intentionally violated in the above mentioned case by the Prosecutor of the year, William Fulbright. Initial appearance was on January 5, 2007 and
Justice Court“trial” was on August 8, 2007. Seven months is far greater than the 6 months required by speedy trial provisions. This amendment was written by the founding fathers to protect against false charges, and their associated damages to the citizen.

Article II Section III of the Montana Constitution gives inalienable rights to Montana citizens. The provisions are for a healthy environment, and to appropriately defend property.

William Fulbright, and George H. Corn were petitioned by 10 Ravalli County residents in July 2006 in a community nuisance petition[2] to uphold these citizens right to a healthy and safe environment.

The RCAO ignored the petition, and decided to prosecute without evidence, which violates rule 3.8 of the Montana Bar Association for prosecution without probable cause. Preamble to the Montana Bar code of ethics is subsection (6) which states that the law should not be used to intimidate or harass individuals.
Obviously the Montana Bar association rules, the Montana Constitution, nor the US Constitution applies to the prosecutors in Ravalli County.

Can a lawyer who wins a prosecutor of the year award violate the basic protections available to Montanaresidents, and American citizens? When RCAO help themselves to a prosecutor award it is mere peanuts in comparison to helping themselves to people’s rights.

(Bill Fulbright won election for Ravalli County Attorney in 2010 on the premise of protecting peoples rights--a classy politician really because Ravalli County has no rights to speak of, and Bill Fulbright is not bringing Ravalli County any closer to America and the guaranteed, protected rights in constitutional documents--its still cash for crime).

[NOTE: See PG. 29-41 of Justice Archive top of http://www.montanamayor.com/ for all Press Releases]


[1] Brownlee Law Firm Hamilton MT 59840 406-363-1777
[2] Community Nuisance petition dated July 2006 is on permanent record at the Ravalli County Administrative Building
215 S. Fourth St. Hamilton, MT 59840 Regina Plettenberg Administrator

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


We the People of Ravalli County
PO Box 416
Hamilton, MT 59840

For Immediate release: For more information:
October 9, 2007 Bitterroot Rising Archive

Ravalli County Attorneys help themselves to Prosecutor award.
Nominate themselves, despite constitutional violations.

Hamilton, Montana- Ravalli County Attorney George H. Corn, nominated William "Bill" Fulbright, a prosecutor from Hamilton as the Montana Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence (MCADSV) “Prosecutor of the Year”.

Bill Fulbright has been a prosecutor in Hamilton for the past 5 years, according to Joel Gallob, reporter for the Ravalli Republic.
Gallob does not site any other references besides prosecutors from the Ravalli County Attorney office in his story from October 8, 2007 published in the Republic.

Comment was not available from Kelsen Young, Executive Director of MCADSV from Helena, who gave the award Friday in Hamilton.

Bill Fulbright as Deputy Ravalli County Attorney violated the basic rights of a defendant in a case where prima facie evidence, that is, evidence to proceed with trial was lacking. In a statement made to defense council Sasha Brownlee[1] prior to trial, Fulbright exclaimed that “… if this had been anyone but (Spreadbury) the case would be dismissed.” This statement is evidence that Bill Fulbright does not respect the rule of law, and prosecutes with malice.

Further this statement violates the Montana Constitution Article II section 4 with respect to equal protection under the law. The same legal provision of equal protection is found in the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.

Bill Fulbright Deputy Ravalli County Attorney demonstrated further evidence of malicious prosecution when he asked a county judge, JP Jim Bailey to violate rules of the court as they pertain to evidence.
In a motion dated July 30, 2007 in State of Montana v. Mike Spreadbury case #TK 2006-3068. Bill Fulbright asked a judge to break the rules of the court for evidence when he failed to submit discovery, a responsibility of the prosecutor on any case.

When discovery is not submitted, that is immediate grounds for dismissal. When Ravalli County is involved however, anything apparently goes. [Angela Wetzsteon was allowed to practice law unsupervised]

Dean Eck of the University of Montana-Missoula School of Law states that when a lawyer initially makes false statements to judicial officers, then they are liable for ethical breech of the Montana Bar Association. Shawna Ryan, administrator for the Montana Bar in Helena, MT could not be reached for comment.
[Dean ECK was given a Presidential appointment to look the other way for Wetzsteon's conduct].

George H. Corn, the nominator for the award, asked the judge for the same evidence request (on the same day) when Bill Fullbright Deputy Ravalli County Attorney was denied on July 30.
George Corn ’s version of the motion was accepted, due to making false statement of “severe injury” to the witness when in fact no medical attention was necessary as the witness inflicted damage to themselves:



"Evidence" produced by law student Angela Wetzsteon

Notice: the RIGHT cheek is scratched by equal-distant lines--like fingernails.

Note: Michael Spreadbury was standing to this woman's LEFT.

Note: No glass embedded, no medical attention needed,
just corrupt Ravalli County Sheriff October 10, 2006

TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK HAS NEW MEANING NOW:
LOOK THE OTHER WAY FOR CORRUPTION IN MONTANA

As with his nomination for the prosecutor award, George H. Corn gets what he wants whenever he asks. Kathy Seeley, Assistant Attorney General for the State of Montana, and Josh Van De Wettering US Attorney in the Missoula office, in letters dated in April and September respectively state that George Corn has “wide latitude” in performing duties as County Attorney for Ravalli County, which seems to mean that he is above the Montana and US Constitutions. With the State of Montana and the US Justice Dept. protecting them, an award is small work for George H. Corn.

A defendant’s 6th Amendment right to speedy trial was intentionally violated in the above mentioned case by the Prosecutor of the year, William Fulbright. Initial appearance was on January 5, 2007 and
Justice Court“trial” was on August 8, 2007. Seven months is far greater than the 6 months required by speedy trial provisions. This amendment was written by the founding fathers to protect against false charges, and their associated damages to the citizen.

Article II Section III of the Montana Constitution gives inalienable rights to Montana citizens. The provisions are for a healthy environment, and to appropriately defend property.

William Fulbright, and George H. Corn were petitioned by 10 Ravalli County residents in July 2006 in a community nuisance petition[2] to uphold these citizens right to a healthy and safe environment.

The RCAO ignored the petition, and decided to prosecute without evidence, which violates rule 3.8 of the Montana Bar Association for prosecution without probable cause. Preamble to the Montana Bar code of ethics is subsection (6) which states that the law should not be used to intimidate or harass individuals.
Obviously the Montana Bar association rules, the Montana Constitution, nor the US Constitution applies to the prosecutors in Ravalli County.

Can a lawyer who wins a prosecutor of the year award violate the basic protections available to Montanaresidents, and American citizens? When RCAO help themselves to a prosecutor award it is mere peanuts in comparison to helping themselves to people’s rights.

(Bill Fulbright won election for Ravalli County Attorney in 2010 on the premise of protecting peoples rights--a classy politician really because Ravalli County has no rights to speak of, and Bill Fulbright is not bringing Ravalli County any closer to America and the guaranteed, protected rights in constitutional documents--its still cash for crime).

[NOTE: See PG. 29-41 of Justice Archive top of http://www.montanamayor.com/ for all Press Releases]


[1] Brownlee Law Firm Hamilton MT 59840 406-363-1777
[2] Community Nuisance petition dated July 2006 is on permanent record at the Ravalli County Administrative Building
215 S. Fourth St. Hamilton, MT 59840 Regina Plettenberg Administrator

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


We the People of Ravalli County
PO Box 416
Hamilton, MT 59840

For Immediate release: For more information:
October 9, 2007 Bitterroot Rising Archive

Ravalli County Attorneys help themselves to Prosecutor award.
Nominate themselves, despite constitutional violations.

Hamilton, Montana- Ravalli County Attorney George H. Corn, nominated William "Bill" Fulbright, a prosecutor from Hamilton as the Montana Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence (MCADSV) “Prosecutor of the Year”.

Bill Fulbright has been a prosecutor in Hamilton for the past 5 years, according to Joel Gallob, reporter for the Ravalli Republic.
Gallob does not site any other references besides prosecutors from the Ravalli County Attorney office in his story from October 8, 2007 published in the Republic.

Comment was not available from Kelsen Young, Executive Director of MCADSV from Helena, who gave the award Friday in Hamilton.

Bill Fulbright as Deputy Ravalli County Attorney violated the basic rights of a defendant in a case where prima facie evidence, that is, evidence to proceed with trial was lacking. In a statement made to defense council Sasha Brownlee[1] prior to trial, Fulbright exclaimed that “… if this had been anyone but (Spreadbury) the case would be dismissed.” This statement is evidence that Bill Fulbright does not respect the rule of law, and prosecutes with malice.

Further this statement violates the Montana Constitution Article II section 4 with respect to equal protection under the law. The same legal provision of equal protection is found in the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.

Bill Fulbright Deputy Ravalli County Attorney demonstrated further evidence of malicious prosecution when he asked a county judge, JP Jim Bailey to violate rules of the court as they pertain to evidence.
In a motion dated July 30, 2007 in State of Montana v. Mike Spreadbury case #TK 2006-3068. Bill Fulbright asked a judge to break the rules of the court for evidence when he failed to submit discovery, a responsibility of the prosecutor on any case.

When discovery is not submitted, that is immediate grounds for dismissal. When Ravalli County is involved however, anything apparently goes. [Angela Wetzsteon was allowed to practice law unsupervised]

Dean Eck of the University of Montana-Missoula School of Law states that when a lawyer initially makes false statements to judicial officers, then they are liable for ethical breech of the Montana Bar Association. Shawna Ryan, administrator for the Montana Bar in Helena, MT could not be reached for comment.
[Dean ECK was given a Presidential appointment to look the other way for Wetzsteon's conduct].

George H. Corn, the nominator for the award, asked the judge for the same evidence request (on the same day) when Bill Fullbright Deputy Ravalli County Attorney was denied on July 30.
George Corn ’s version of the motion was accepted, due to making false statement of “severe injury” to the witness when in fact no medical attention was necessary as the witness inflicted damage to themselves:



"Evidence" produced by law student Angela Wetzsteon

Notice: the RIGHT cheek is scratched by equal-distant lines--like fingernails.

Note: Michael Spreadbury was standing to this woman's LEFT.

Note: No glass embedded, no medical attention needed,
just corrupt Ravalli County Sheriff October 10, 2006

TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK HAS NEW MEANING NOW:
LOOK THE OTHER WAY FOR CORRUPTION IN MONTANA

As with his nomination for the prosecutor award, George H. Corn gets what he wants whenever he asks. Kathy Seeley, Assistant Attorney General for the State of Montana, and Josh Van De Wettering US Attorney in the Missoula office, in letters dated in April and September respectively state that George Corn has “wide latitude” in performing duties as County Attorney for Ravalli County, which seems to mean that he is above the Montana and US Constitutions. With the State of Montana and the US Justice Dept. protecting them, an award is small work for George H. Corn.

A defendant’s 6th Amendment right to speedy trial was intentionally violated in the above mentioned case by the Prosecutor of the year, William Fulbright. Initial appearance was on January 5, 2007 and
Justice Court“trial” was on August 8, 2007. Seven months is far greater than the 6 months required by speedy trial provisions. This amendment was written by the founding fathers to protect against false charges, and their associated damages to the citizen.

Article II Section III of the Montana Constitution gives inalienable rights to Montana citizens. The provisions are for a healthy environment, and to appropriately defend property.

William Fulbright, and George H. Corn were petitioned by 10 Ravalli County residents in July 2006 in a community nuisance petition[2] to uphold these citizens right to a healthy and safe environment.

The RCAO ignored the petition, and decided to prosecute without evidence, which violates rule 3.8 of the Montana Bar Association for prosecution without probable cause. Preamble to the Montana Bar code of ethics is subsection (6) which states that the law should not be used to intimidate or harass individuals.
Obviously the Montana Bar association rules, the Montana Constitution, nor the US Constitution applies to the prosecutors in Ravalli County.

Can a lawyer who wins a prosecutor of the year award violate the basic protections available to Montanaresidents, and American citizens? When RCAO help themselves to a prosecutor award it is mere peanuts in comparison to helping themselves to people’s rights.

(Bill Fulbright won election for Ravalli County Attorney in 2010 on the premise of protecting peoples rights--a classy politician really because Ravalli County has no rights to speak of, and Bill Fulbright is not bringing Ravalli County any closer to America and the guaranteed, protected rights in constitutional documents--its still cash for crime).

[NOTE: See PG. 29-41 of Justice Archive top of http://www.montanamayor.com/ for all Press Releases]


[1] Brownlee Law Firm Hamilton MT 59840 406-363-1777
[2] Community Nuisance petition dated July 2006 is on permanent record at the Ravalli County Administrative Building
215 S. Fourth St. Hamilton, MT 59840 Regina Plettenberg Administrator

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.